Annette Haven

I’m not a scientist, this is just what I have read in various places.

First of all, I think Australia is probably quite contaminated, from dirty uranium mining, and from the military using du ammo in various activities there. Also nuke bombs were detonated there, years ago.

DU contamination from its use in Iraq has also been blown all over, including in the Southern Hemisphere.

Leuren Moret is a source I trust. I suggest that people look uo her interviews, on You Tube, and on Alfred Webre’s Exopolitics website. She is a longtime anti-nuke activist.

She and others say that the radiation will travel around the globe and into the Southern Hemisphere. Time this will take, I have read, is between 1-2 years.

Moret at one point said she thought a good place to go might be on the equator, in the mountains. On the equator is an upwelling of warm air which might act as a kind of barrier to the falling radionuclides.

The ‘great conveyor belt’ ocean current will carry the radioactive ocean water over into the Atlantic.

Although the radiation will travel the globe, doubtless there will be relatively safe, or safer, pockets, due to wind patterns, etc. My guess is that the elites know all of this and have and are keeping detailed records, but are sitting on the information and will continue to do so.

BTW Helen, as a teenager I sometimes used to get bad metallic tastes during/after a heavy flu. Is this another clinical observation oto be ruled out, or was I the only person ever to experience this subjective phenomenon?

You might find this interesting too: Enson Inoue’s Trip to Fukushima
https://video.aol.com/aolvideo/aol-sports/yamato-damashii-diaries/941264172001

Dear Dr. Helen Caldicott,

I just listened to your very good interviews with Dr. Arnie Gunderson and Aileen Midco Smith on ‘If You Love This Planet.’

You know a lot about nuclear issues, enough to ask some very good questions, which made for excellent interviews.

At one point you were discussing what it is in the Japanese character that makes this whole scenario possible - the government keeping people in danger, basically, and lying about the dangers, and the people basically so docile (for instance, taking their kids back to Fukushima when told that schools were opening. I would have said, no way is my kid going to school there this year worth risking his/her life!).

I would like to present - and ask if you agree with - my own observations. I think this whole thing is just SO big, so overwhelming, that really to deal with it as, say, the Russians did with Chernobyl, would be logistically impossible. There are too many people too close to ‘ground zero’ and no places to take or put them all, move them all to. The situation is different in several critically important ways from that the Russians faced with Chernobyl. (The costs of trying to deal appropriately with this disaster would be astronomical, it seems to me - such as just getting all the affected people to safer locations and compensating those affected - like farmers, fishermen, etc. who have lost their livelihoods. Conscious decisions are being made behind closed doors to sacrifice these people rather than spending money trying to help them and move them to safety.)

It is not just the Japanese who are acting like the famous see/hear/speak no evil trio of monkeys … it is the governments, media, and people of the entire globe. For instance, the US and Canada are directly downwind of this planned and occurring incineration or radioactive-contaminated materials — but there is nary a peep of protest. These governments are not protesting, not trying to protect their own people ditto the so-called ‘watch dog’ (more appropriately, lap dog) MSM. Rather they are protecting the nuclear power industry, and protecting and participating in the Japanese government’s program of de facto genocide.

Basically all of the governments of the Northern Hemisphere, who have gone ahead with this dangerous industry ‘have egg on their faces’ (and are even arguably guilty of crimes for having allowed such dangerous facilities to be built in the first place) and are just hoping to smooth things over and lie about the consequences, greater cancer rates, more deformed births, etc. and keep on winging it and covering it up as best they can - which with the degree of control they have and the degree of denial in the masses, might well be quite a bit, for quite a while.

This is how I see it and have seen it from the start, and I am just wondering if you agree with me.

Also I think we are in deep trouble at this point and facing massive poisoning of the biosphere and massive die-offs of plant and animal and human life. I am no expert but it seem to me that it is such an extremely catastrophic situation that expertise is not needed to get a sense of the magnitude of the problem, with so much radioactive material now in existence, with such long lifespans up to a quarter of a million years and more.

I know it is kind of a touchy thing to come out and express an opinion, for you as an widely known fiigure, but still I am asking your opinion.

Sincerely,
Tawny